skip to Main Content

President Trump Announces Additional Tariffs on China; Beijing Pledged to Respond

U.S. and Chinese officials held trade talks on Wednesday in China.  News reports noted that increased purchases of U.S. agricultural products were discussed, although no significant breakthroughs were announced at the conclusion of the meeting.  Additional talks are scheduled to take place in September.  Meanwhile, recent trade data shows that big agricultural purchases by China remain elusive; and on Thursday, President Trump announced additional tariffs on Chinese imports.

Trade Talks Conclude- Agricultural Purchases Discussed- Next Round Scheduled for September

Earlier this week, New York Times writer Alexandra Stevenson reported that, “American and Chinese negotiators finished talks on Wednesday with little progress toward ending a trade war that has shaken the world’s economic confidence and rattled markets.”

The Times article explained that, “Chinese officials welcomed the American delegation with a dinner on Tuesday at the Fairmont Peace Hotel on Shanghai’s famous Bund promenade.

“But around the same time in Washington, President Trump accused China of failing to follow through on its promises, adding that a deal was unlikely to be reached before the 2020 United States presidential election.

He also complained that China had not started to buy American agricultural goods as he said was promised after he met with Mr. Xi in Japan. Chinese officials have disputed that they agreed to the purchases.

Ms. Stevenson pointed out that, “CCTV reported on Wednesday that trade negotiators had discussed how China would increase its purchases of American agricultural goods as well as how the United States would ‘create favorable conditions for procurement’ of technology.”

The Times article added that, “The White House statement said that the two sides had discussed topics including ‘forced technology transfer, intellectual property rights, services, non-tariff barriers and agriculture‘ and that the Chinese side had confirmed its commitment to increase purchases of American agricultural exports.”

Closer Look at Chinese Agricultural Purchases

Earlier this week, Bloomberg writers Michael Hirtzer and Dominic Carey reported that,  “During an initial cooling of the trade-war rhetoric earlier this year, Chinese buyers made a few goodwill purchases of American beans. But sales slowed to a near halt after talks broke down in May, and have yet to pick up significantly now that negotiators from Washington and Beijing are meeting in person in Shanghai.”

“Trump Says China Isn’t Buying American Agriculture Goods. The Data Backs Him Up,” by Michael Hirtzer and Dominic Carey. Bloomberg News (July 30, 2019).

The Bloomberg article stated that, “Through May, the value of all U.S. agriculture exports to China including products such as cotton and pork fell to $4.3 billion from $6.2 billion in the same year-ago period, U.S. government data show.

“While any purchases in recent weeks are yet to show up in the trade data, 2019 is falling behind 2018, a year many farmers and investors were hoping was an outlier.

For all of 2018, U.S. agriculture exports to China came to $9.1 billion, less than half 2017 levels and the lowest since 2007.

And Reuters writer Karl Plume reported earlier this week that, “U.S. government data on Monday showed exports of soybeans to China picking up to the most in five months last week ahead of trade talks between the two countries in Shanghai, although the shipments were for beans bought months ago and new purchases have proven elusive.

Mr. Plume noted that, “A small amount of U.S. pork has been sold. But the USDA has not confirmed any new soy purchases by China since the G20, even after China last week offered five companies a chance to buy limited amounts of U.S. soy tariff-free. USDA rules require exporters to report any grain sales of more than 100,000 tonnes to a single destination within 24 hours.

China bought about 14.3 million tonnes of U.S. soybeans in the 2018/19 season which began last September, the least in 11 years, and more than 4 million tonnes of those purchases have yet to be shipped, USDA data showed.

“China has shipped 1.62 million tonnes of previously purchased U.S. soybeans since the Osaka meeting, less than the several millions tonnes state media said had been shipped on Sunday,” the Reuters article said.

And on Thursday, Reuters writers Mark Weinraub and Karl Plume reported that, “The U.S. Department of Agriculture on Thursday confirmed a private Chinese company bought 68,000 tonnes of soybeans in the week ended July 25, the first soybean purchase since Beijing offered to exempt five crushers from import tariffs imposed more than a year ago as part of a U.S.-China trade dispute.”

Also this week, Bloomberg writer Tatiana Freitas reported that, “Brazilian farmers will likely spend more money on soybean farming in the coming season as the U.S.-China trade war continues to leave room for the South American powerhouse to increase its grip on the title of world’s biggest exporter of the oilseed.

“Crop-nutrient giants Mosaic Co. and Yara International ASA expect fertilizer deliveries to Brazilian producers will reach a record. Planting in the country starts in September and most of the sales for the coming season have already been made, underscoring the confidence in the forecasts.”

“Brazil Soy Farmers Spend More to Exploit Their Trade War Edge,” by Tatiana Freitas. Bloomberg News (July 31).

The article added that, “Brazil has benefited from China’s yearlong trade dispute with the U.S., the second-biggest soybean exporter. A spring deluge that threatened crops in the U.S. Midwest gave the South American country an added advantage.”

President Trump Announces Additional Tariffs on Chinese Imports

Wall Street Journal writers Vivian Salama and William Mauldin reported on Thursday that, “President Trump moved Thursday to extend tariffs to essentially all Chinese imports, escalating a trade conflict that is poised to hit U.S. consumers in the pocketbook and roiling financial markets.

The new tariffs would take effect Sept. 1 and cover $300 billion in Chinese goods—including smartphones, apparel, toys and other consumer products. They would come on top of tariffs already imposed on $250 billion in imports from China.

“‘If they don’t want to trade with us anymore, that would be fine with me,’ Mr. Trump said at the White House.”

The Journal writers noted that, “Mr. Trump made public his plans to impose tariffs in a series of tweets that followed a briefing from his trade team on this week’s negotiations in Shanghai. Those talks ended with neither side detailing significant progress toward resolving the more-than-yearlong dispute.”

The Wall Street Journal reported this week that the slow progress in trade talks was partly the result of a new tactic from Beijing, which increasingly thinks waiting may produce a more favorable agreement,” the article said.

Bloomberg News reported on Thursday that, “Beijing pledged to respond if the U.S. insists on adding extra tariffs to the remainder of Chinese imports, as President Donald Trump’s abrupt escalation of the trade war between the world’s two largest economies sent stocks tumbling from Asia to Europe.”

“A fresh salvo from Donald Trump in the U.S.-China trade war has roiled agriculture markets, deepening weekly losses and damping chances of any fresh Chinese purchases of American farm products.” (“Crop Markets Deepen Weekly Losses as Trump Escalates Trade War.” Bloomberg News (August 1, 2019)).

The article indicated that, “‘If the U.S. is going to implement the additional tariffs, China will have to take necessary countermeasures,’ Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said at a regular briefing in Beijing on Friday. She didn’t elaborate on what the measures would be.

“‘China won’t accept any maximum pressure, threat, or blackmailing, and won’t compromise at all on major principle matters,’ Hua said.”

“Trump has repeatedly complained that China hasn’t made the ‘large quantities‘ of agricultural purchases that he claims Xi promised when then they met in Osaka, but what was actually promised has never been made public and the two sides’ interpretations appear to differ,” the Bloomberg article said.

 

Keith Good Photo

Keith Good is the Farm Policy News editor for the farmdoc project. He has previously worked for the USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service, and compiled the daily FarmPolicy.com News Summary from 2003-2015. He is a graduate of Purdue University (M.S.- Agricultural Economics), and Southern Illinois University School of Law.

Back To Top