Politico’s Grace Yarrow and Rachel Shin reported that “a remarkable streak of wins in farm country battlegrounds delivered Democrats majority control of Congress on Tuesday. Now Democrats have to put a vision for food and agriculture policy into action.”
“Tuesday’s results suggested voters were unswayed by recent Republican efforts to shore up the agriculture economy, with several key farm-state races flipping by significant margins,” Yarrow and Shin reported. “But the party’s impending takeover of the Senate and House Agriculture Committees leave its members facing the onerous task of advancing farm policy and mending the social safety net while facing a White House that may see little incentive to cooperate.”
Progressive Farmer’s Jake Zajkowski reported that “Democrats will face pressure to address rising fuel and agricultural input costs, trade concerns and the effects of global conflicts on agricultural markets while needing to find compromises with the White House.”
How Election Results Could Alter Lame Duck Farm Bill Negotiations
Agri-Pulse’s Olivia M. Bridges, Kim Chipman, Hannah Guthoerl, Noah Wicks reported that “one of the most immediate questions in the wake of the upcoming power reversal on Capitol Hill is if the shift will change how Democrats negotiate a farm bill. Republican and Democratic ag leaders previously have said they are committed to forging a bipartisan deal that would allow a farm bill to pass Congress this year.”
Progressive Farmer’s Zajkowski reported in a different article that “on Election Day, Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, broke with the notion that Republicans would not consider a two-year SNAP cost-share extension to win Democratic support for the farm bill.”
“‘I hate to talk about compromising on getting fraud out of food stamps, but there may be some sort of compromise. We’ll have to do with the Democrats to get 60 votes to get the bill out,’ he told reporters Tuesday. ‘It’ll take some compromise, maybe on this food stamp issue,'” Zajkowski reported. “Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., has called the one-year SNAP cost-share delay Republicans’ and the White House’s final offer.”
“Grassley called a two-year, $18 billion cost-share arrangement ‘irresponsible,’ but also said, ‘On the other hand, we have a chance of getting E15 if we get this farm bill passed, and that’s $14 billion more in the pockets of farmers, so that’s what I’ve got to analyze,'” Zajkowski reported.
But, AgWeb’s Clare Otto reported that Mary Kay Thatcher of MK Thatcher Consulting “expressed deep skepticism that lawmakers will manage to pass a full farm bill before the end of the year, particularly given the tight margin by which the current House version passed and the ongoing partisan disputes over SNAP funding. ‘We are going to have a farm bill extension,’ she predicted. ‘I have no qualms that that will happen.’“
Former Democrat Ag Leaders Hope for Return to Bipartisanship
Agri-Pulse’s Olivia M. Bridges, Kim Chipman, Noah Wicks reported that “the stunning upset of Republican incumbents across rural America has some Democrats hoping that a return to bipartisanship is near — at least for agriculture.”
“‘It’s a reset button for bipartisanship as it relates to the farm bill and as it relates to agricultural policy,’ former Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D., tells Agri-Pulse,” Bridges, Chipman and Wicks reported. “‘My hope is that we get back to ag policy being bipartisan, and almost nonpartisan.'”
Agri-Pulse’s Chipman and Wicks reported in a different article that “the horde of Democrats headed for Capitol Hill in January will offer a chance to reset how agriculture and food policy is handled, says former House Ag Committee Chairman Collin Peterson.”
“‘You can’t run farm policy on just one party. If you do that, you’re going to end up going back and forth and farmers are going to get whipsawed,’ he said,” according to Chipman and Wicks’ reporting. “‘They need to get back to doing things the way they used to do them, and maybe this election was enough to get their attention to make them do that.'”
